C&P condition guide

    C&P exam for hip condition: what to expect and how VA rates it.

    Use this educational guide to understand the DBQ topics, rating criteria, exam-room measurements, evidence, and possible secondary issues tied to hip condition.

    How VA rates hip condition

    VA rates hip ankylosis, motion loss, flail joint, and femur impairment under 38 CFR § 4.71a, DCs 5250–5255. Flexion bands under DC 5252 are 45°/10%, 30°/20%, 20°/30%, and 10°/40%. Paired hip ratings may receive the bilateral factor.

    38 CFR § 4.71, Plate II: normal hip flexion is 0–125° and abduction is 0–45°.

    Rating criteria from the tool data

    RatingWhat VA looks for
    60/70/90%DC 5250: favorable, intermediate, or extremely unfavorable hip ankylosis
    10–40%DC 5252: flexion limited to 45°, 30°, 20°, or 10°
    80%DC 5254: hip flail joint
    60–80%DC 5255: qualifying femur fracture nonunion or false joint; malunion is evaluated under the affected hip or knee codes

    DBQ and symptom topics to review

    Review these topics against your own records and symptoms. Do not exaggerate or minimize; describe functional impact accurately.

    • Hip flexion limited to 45 degrees10%DC 5252
    • Hip flexion limited to 30 degrees20%DC 5252
    • Hip flexion limited to 20 degrees30%DC 5252
    • Hip flexion limited to 10 degrees40%DC 5252
    • Documented favorable hip ankylosis: fixed in flexion between 20 and 40 degrees, with slight adduction or abduction60%DC 5250; stiffness alone is not ankylosis
    • Hip flail joint80%DC 5254

    What may happen in the exam room

    • Goniometer measurement of flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and rotation
    • Active, passive, weight-bearing, and non-weight-bearing motion when feasible
    • Repetitive-use testing
    • Gait and assistive-device observation

    Measurements and findings to understand

    • Angle where pain begins
    • Motion after at least three repetitions
    • Estimated loss during flare-ups or repeated use
    • Whether the joint is fixed
    • Functional effect on sitting, stairs, dressing, and walking

    Questions the examiner may cover

    • How often do hip flare-ups occur and how long do they last?
    • How far can you walk or sit before symptoms increase?
    • Do you use a cane, crutch, or walker?
    • Does the hip alter your gait or affect the back or opposite leg?

    Functional-impact language to think through

    Use plain, truthful wording that matches your records and daily limitations. These examples are prompts for accuracy, not scripts.

    • Describe the actual range-limiting point, not the furthest motion you can force.
    • Explain difficulty putting on socks, entering a vehicle, climbing stairs, or rising from a chair.
    • Describe gait changes and which side bears extra weight.

    Common mistakes to avoid

    • Pushing through painful ROM
    • Saying it is fine today without describing flare-ups
    • Confusing hip-joint motion with a separate thigh muscle injury

    Evidence to organize before the exam

    • Hip and Thigh Conditions DBQ
    • Imaging and orthopedic notes
    • Physical therapy ROM measurements
    • Assistive-device prescription
    • Flare and walking-distance log

    Preparation notes

    • Identify the affected side and whether both hips are involved.
    • Describe the worst typical functional day accurately.

    DeLuca and flare-up notes

    DeLuca and painful motion: Under 38 CFR §§ 4.40, 4.45, and 4.59, the examiner should address pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination, repeated use, and flare-ups. Explain pain onset and the actual functional endpoint separately. Follow the examiner's safety instructions; do not force movement or alter it to match a rating.

    Official rating source

    38 CFR 4.71a, DCs 5250-5255. Checked 2026-09-04. Educational preparation only; not a personal rating.

    How secondary service connection works

    A secondary condition is not automatic. The evidence must connect a current diagnosed disability to an already service-connected condition or its medically indicated treatment.

    1. Basic evidence: a current diagnosis, an already service-connected primary condition, and competent evidence linking the two.
    2. Two theories: the primary condition or its treatment caused the new disability under 38 CFR § 3.310(a), or aggravated a pre-existing non-service-connected disability under § 3.310(b). An opinion should address both when the record raises both; causation alone may be inadequate (El-Amin).
    3. Treatment pathway: service-connected condition → medically indicated medication or surgery → documented adverse effect → current diagnosis. Pharmacy records, start and stop dates, and a treating clinician’s reasoning matter; medication use alone does not establish the connection.
    4. Weight as an intermediate step: obesity or weight gain can be part of the causal chain under VAOPGCPREC 1-2017, but obesity itself is not a disability for a VA rating.
    5. Standard of proof: VA applies the “at least as likely as not” standard and reasonable-doubt rule under 38 CFR § 3.102. This guide identifies evidence questions; it does not tell you what to file.
    6. Avoid pyramiding: 38 CFR § 4.14 prohibits rating the same manifestation twice. Mental-health diagnoses generally use one § 4.130 evaluation for the same occupational and social impairment, and insomnia may be a symptom rather than a separate disability.
    7. Presumptives are different: qualifying service may make chronic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, hypertension associated with herbicide exposure, or type 2 diabetes presumptive. OSA is not a PACT Act presumptive. Check current eligibility before seeking nexus evidence for a condition the law may already presume.
    8. DBQ is not a nexus: a DBQ documents diagnosis and severity; it does not necessarily establish service connection. A VA-accredited VSO can help with filing strategy at no charge.

    Other medically indicated treatments for a service-connected condition may support a secondary theory when a clinician documents the adverse effect in this veteran.

    Sources: 38 CFR § 3.310 · 38 CFR § 4.14 · VA-accredited representatives

    Possible secondary conditions to discuss with a qualified reviewer

    These are educational issue-spotting notes, not medical nexus opinions. VA decides service connection.

    Lumbar Spine ConditionCommon evidence path

    Review when altered gait is documented and a clinician supports causation or aggravation.

    Opposite Hip or Knee ConditionCommon evidence path

    Compensatory loading is an issue to review, not an automatic relationship.